| |
|
|
GreenMoney Journal - publishing since 1992
Fall 2010 issue
Socially Responsible Investing – Better Companies, Better Communities
|
| |
Closing the Loop
Bob Massie
The recent death of Dana Meadows hit me as hard as if a close personal friend had died. I had only
met her once. At the end of a long, tedious meeting in Boston she came up to me, full of warmth
and goodwill, to express the desire to talk more. We made fervent mutual promises to spend
together some day, but we did not pursue them with any urgency. And then the unlimited time we
thought we had ran out. Still, I feel as though she is part of my thinking, because she introduced
me - and so many others - to the idea of interdependent systems and feedback loops.
Now I
see feedback loops everywhere. Sometimes when I drive to pick up my sons at school I take a street
that runs down a long hill. It's a residential street, so the speed limit is only 20 miles an
hour, but because of the length of the hill and the effect of gravity it is extremely easy for
one's speed to pick up. The local police recently solved the problem by installing a simple but
effective feedback device. It consists of a large electronic display on wheels. Above the display
it says "Speed Limit: 20 Miles An Hour." The electronic display says: "Your Speed" and then shows
a number transmitted from a radar gun pointed at oncoming cars. When drivers approaching the sign
realize that they are going too fast, they instinctively tap the brakes until the electronic number
comes into alignment with the printed one. It's a classic loop: behavior is translated into
communicated information, and the information was translated back into behavior. It's a well
known, natural phenomenon. Every time we snatch back our hand from a hot pan, or slow down on an
icy sidewalk, we are adjusting our behavior on the basis of information.
This feedback
principle lies at the heart of both business and investment. Sometimes, when one stops to look at
a business as a physical process - the amazingly intricate sequencing of ideas, words, actions,
and objects all interacting across so many moments in time and points in space - one is astonished
that human beings are capable of such complexity. We have succeeded because we have learned to
create particular kinds of feedback loops that distill and simplify data. To calculate whether a
firm is "making money" (a strange phrase, when you really think about it) we need not only to
define, understand, and measure revenues and expenses, but also to understand their relationship
over periods of time. Defining, measuring, and establishing the relationship between valuations
at different points in time is in fact at the heart of finance theory.
Equally important,
our inability to design good feedback loops can lead to serious failures -- with long-term
consequences for ourselves and for the world around us. More and more investment and accounting
professionals have come to realize that despite the enormous sophistication and years of accrued
learning imbedded in our accounting systems, they are missing very basic, critical information
about companies. A new magazine recently targeted at "intellectual capital investors" appeared
with articles by eminent securities officials and accounting leaders. They all point out that
despite the importance of information and knowledge in the modern economy, current accounting has
no way of measuring "intellectual capital" as an asset. "Assets" are still predominantly defined
as physical objects, even though physical objects may represent only a tiny fraction of the value
of the firm.
Another area where too many critical decisions and impacts remain invisible
is, of course, that of sustainability. For years it was impossible to tell the difference between
those companies that wasted resources, took dangerous environmental risks, and ignored both the
short and long-term damage they were causing from those that had begun to integrate environmental
improvement into their core business strategies. Thanks to the work of the social investment
community in promoting the CERES Principles and CERES reporting standards, it is now considered
"best practice" for companies to issue an environmental report. Website at: http://www.ceres.org
The discussion is really no longer about whether a firm should report but how.
There
was a danger, just a few years ago, that the intensity of interest in reporting and disclosure
could actually backfire by producing conflicting standards of information release. Back in 1997,
taking a leaf from the work of the Financial Accounting Standards Board and International
Accounting Standards Committee, CERES decided to launch an international process - known as the
Global Reporting Initiative (or GRI) to build consensus on sustainability reporting guidelines
Funded by the MacArthur, Ford, Mott, and United Nations Foundation, the GRI evolved into a strong
alliance that includes the United Nations Environment Programme, key advocacy groups from all over
the world, some unusually bold companies, and international accounting societies. Driven partly by
the surge of global interest and the easy interaction of e-mail, consensus was built rapidly enough
to release a "beta test" document in March 1999 and a "version 1.0" set of guidelines in June 2000.
The guidelines - and an immense amounts of information about the GRI process - are available at
www.globalreporting.org
Over the next year GRI plans to move aggressively in two
directions: the continued improvement of the guidelines and the establishment of a permanent GRI.
The revision of the guidelines is being guided by a large number of people from many organizations
and regions under the overall direction of an international Measurement Working Group. The group
is already hard at work evaluating appropriate disclosure requirements on everything from
greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity impacts to labor and human rights standards. The work
will be completed over the course of 2001 so that the 2002 version of the GRI guidelines can be
released in time for the World Summit on Sustainable Development -- the tenth anniversary meeting
of the Rio Earth Summit -- which will take place in Johannesburg.
The establishment of
the permanent GRI is also actively under way. Currently managed by CERES and UNEP under the
guidance of an international steering committee, the GRI will migrate towards the end of the year
to a new structure with an international Stakeholder Council, a Technical Advisory Committee, and
an independent board of directors. The special Nominating Committee, chaired by World Resources
Institute president Jonathan Lash, is being formed and will soon begin the sober task of picking
new permanent board members. A final piece of the puzzle - which should emerge late next fall -
will be the creation of a "charter group" of civil society organizations, companies, UN agencies,
investor and accountancy groups, and others who will step forward to support the formation of the
permanent organization.
With a new set of guidelines and new a organization to provide
stewardship and improvement, the GRI will be addressing a problem that social investors have
identified for years: the need for credible, comparable information about the environmental,
social, and human rights performance of companies. The impact of this new tool is likely to be
immense. Companies will have a set of management tools and indicators that allow them to manage
their operations and respond to the vigilant, well-connected stakeholders. Stakeholders, in turn,
will have strong, well thought-out mechanisms to insure disclosure of key impacts of companies -
backed up, in time, by a network of internal and external auditors and verifiers. This system,
when applied to the financial world, has allowed for the creation of dynamic capital markets that
have improved the economic health of many communities. Now is the time to use those same methods
to improve the social and environmental health of those same communities - which is, of course, the
goal of sustainability.
This brings us back -- naturally -- to the feedback loop. Can
something as simple as the measurement and disclosure of information really cause fundamental
changes in behavior?
Probably the best illustration comes from an experience my two sons
had at a nature camp several years ago. About fifty children from the same school had gone away
together for a week to study eco-systems on the coast of Rhode Island under a program known as
"Nature's Classroom." The children ate all their meals together, sitting at long tables in a
dining hall. At the end of each meal, the staff scraped all the children's uneaten food off of
their plates into a 5 gallon plastic bucket. Then they put the bucket on a scale and weighed it -
4 pounds of waste. They marked that amount on a bar graph on the wall in the dining room
The counselors explained to the children that after every meal they would do the same thing -
collect the food, weight the total, and mark the result on the bar graph, which was called the "Ort
Report." What's "ort?" It turns out that it is a real word - from Old English - which means
"uneaten food." Centuries ago people were regularly hungry, and the existence of "ort" was
considered a sin. The goal, said the counselors, was for the children to choose their food
carefully and not to put more on their plates then they would actually eat. If they did that, they
would drive the daily Ort Report graph down to zero.
The children, some of whom were
only eight year olds, understand the concept and the challenge immediately. That night, at
dinner, the children who had been outside all afternoon, put much too much on their plates and the
Ort Report went up to six pounds. But starting the next day they quickly revised their behavior -
and over the course of the week, the Ort Report steadily went down. On the last meal of the week,
the Ort Report showed that food waste had been reduced to a few ounces of orange rinds and banana
peels.
Our businesses and economies are running way over the ecological speed limit. Why?
Because we haven't yet designed the right feedback loops through which information changes our
individual, collective, and corporate behavior. But through the work of thousands of investors,
activists, executives whose work has helped lay the foundation for the GRI, that may finally
change. We must hope so - because, as in my unrealized friendship with Dana Meadows - we may have
much less time that we think.
Article by Bob Massie, former Executive Director of CERES
and chair of the Global Reporting Initiative Steering Committee
|
|
|
Home | Archives
| Sponsors |
Links | Calendar
| Contact Us |
Advertising
| SRI News
MISSION
STATEMENT
The GreenMoney Journal encour-ages and promotes the awareness of socially
& environmentally responsible business, investing and consumer
resources in publications & online.
Our goal is to educate and empower individuals and businesses to make
informed financial decisions through aligning their personal, corporate
and financial principles.
“Responsibility from the Supermarket to the Stockmarket.”
The material presented in this news letter is for educational and
informa-tional purposes only. The GreenMoney Journal does not endorse
or recommend firms, products, funds or advertisers.
GreenMoney is a registered trademark.
Copyright 1995-2010 by the
GreenMoneyJournal ®
Green Money is a Registrated Trademark
of The GreenMoney Journal / Cliff Feigenbaum
|
|
|
|
