Green Money

Green Money Journal

Subscribe to the GreenMoney Journal E-Newsletter

SRI Mutual Funds Guide

Subscribe to the GreenMoney Journal

2003 Independant Press Awards
Nominee for
General Excellence
in 2001, 2002 and 2003
GreenMoney Journal to be honored by WISDOM Media

Green Money In The News

Past Issues:


Fall 2010: Socially Responsible Investing – Better Companies, Better Communities

Summer 2010: Sustainable Business – Green Building & Design

Spring 2010: Socially Responsible Investing - Where to Now? Financial Transformation

Winter 2009/10: GreenMoney's Best Articles Issue

Past Issues / Archive
1999 - 2004




Search by keyword:
Investing with your Values
The revised and updated edition of "Investing With Your Values" (New Society Publishers) can be ordered here.



Please support our sponsors

Harvard Business School

GreenMoney Journal - publishing since 1992

Fall 2010 issue

Socially Responsible Investing – Better Companies, Better Communities

 

Ethical Corporation Magazine Funds International - September 30, 2001

The responsible thing
Denny Coote examines the growth of socially responsible investing as it becomes an increasingly important industry trend
While investing ethically you can make money and do good at the same time. Socially responsible funds have outperformed, or will outperform, their 'less social' counterparts in the long term.

Socially responsible investing (SRI) compels fund managers to consider a company's social and ethical stance before deciding whether to invest in its shares. In the past, SRI was typically undertaken by those with alternative lifestyles, or by churches and charities. But recently there has been a boom in SRI - also referred to as sustainability investment - among a far wider spectrum of investors, prompting some industry analysts to argue that ethical investing is now entering the mainstream. In the US, for example, from 1997 to 1999 assets in all segments of social investing grew 82 percent to U$2.16 trillion, representing about 13 percent of the U$16.3 trillion under professional management in the country.

According to new research on SRI by UBS Warburg*, the UK also witnessed strong growth in the area, with the universe of retail ethical funds doubling in size every three years during the 1990s. Assets under management in the sector rose from #321 million in 1990 to #3.197 billion in 1999.

In Germany too, ethical funds have grown in popularity. SEB Invest, which started Germany's first ethical fund in 1998, saw inflows from retail and institutional investors rise 10-fold last year, despite the market downturn, the UBS report points out.

The performance arguments
The growth in SRI can be attributed in part to government legislation, which for example, forces pension funds to disclose their stance on SRI. But more significantly there has been a growing feeling among investors that companies that identify and manage social risk tend to outperform less social ones.

The UBS report highlights the strong performance of socially screened universes such as the Domini Social Equity and Citizens Index as evidence that superior corporate social performance translates directly into strong stock price appreciation.

UBS Warburg also cites Wisenberger's 1999 study of 183 socially screened funds across 41 different investment categories. It was found that, on average, socially screened funds outperformed their non-social counterparts over the previous three-, five- and ten-year periods. Additionally, separate research in the UK, compiled in the CIS Ethical Investors Guide for August 2001, has indicated that ethical funds have been showing above-average performance over the long-term, with the average fund providing 45 percent growth in the last five years. That compares to 42.6 percent for unit trusts and OEICS as a whole.

The bottom line
UBS Warburg cites a number of reasons why socially responsible industries appear to perform well, with quality management being just one factor. Another important consideration is that a company's socially responsible practices serve as another avenue to promote the brand. A company with a strong brand name attracts better employees and can charge a premium for its products and services, which in turn filters through to the bottom line. Additionally, ethical firms may already be prosperous and their social stance may be a result of their prosperity. A prosperous company has more incentive to treat its stakeholders well, and invest in the environment and in the communities in which it operates.

While adaptation of an SRI program may be costly to begin with, there is some evidence to suggest that SRI programmes, particularly in the environmental area, can stimulate operating efficiencies by generating greater capital turnover and innovation.

Also, a firm's commitment to spending money on socially responsible practices, rather than other things, provides signals of management's confidence in the future prospects of the firm, the UBS Warburg report notes.

Despite these positives, UBS Warburg points out that claims that ethical funds outperform should be treated with care. Its report states that although it can be argued that SRI-aware corporate managements are good managements, the exclusion of a large number of stocks on ethical grounds may seriously restrict investment universes for SRI funds.

The report explains further that outperforming SRI results may have had less to do with the rewards of ethical corporate management than they did with the kinds of stocks that have recently been hot. For example, the Domini Social Index and the Citizens index are both tilted towards large capitalisation growth stocks, and in particular overweight the technology stocks that dominated the performance of the market up until last year, after which technology growth stocks collapsed.

European growth
Looking ahead, UBS Warburg expects growth in SRI to accelerate across Europe, citing forecasts by Barchester Green Investment which state that the retail market for SRI products could reach #10 billion by 2003 in the UK. In continental Europe, new German pension reforms will require new occupational schemes and private pension schemes to disclose their stance on SRI, as in the UK system. German pension funds are forecast to grow to 500 billion euros by 2008 and pressure from trade unions and other groups will mean that increasingly SRI schemes are likely to be adopted (see FI 80).

Reflecting the demand for SRI, the FTSE4Good UK, European, US and global indices were launched in July. The indices are designed to track the performance of companies with a good record of social responsibility and screen out those that do not come up to standard on social, ethical and human rights policies. UBS Warburg sees the FTSE4Good index family as having "a real chance of evolving into the benchmark of choice for socially responsible investors."

The FTSE4GoodUK is not the first group of such indices to be introduced. Dow Jones Index launched its Sustainability Group Index two years ago and there is now U$2.2 billion benchmarked against it globally.

* Sustainability Investment: The Merits of Socially Responsible Investing, UBS Warburg, August 2001

Subscribe to Green Money


Home | Archives | Sponsors | Links | Calendar | Contact Us | Advertising | SRI News


Green Money Journal
Publisher & Managing Editor
Cliff Feigenbaum
Editor
Ted Ketcham  
PO Box 67
Santa Fe, NM 87504
(505) 988-7423
cliff@greenmoney.com
Subscriptions [$50]
www.greenmoney.com
(800) 849-8751

MISSION STATEMENT
The GreenMoney Journal encour-ages and promotes the awareness of socially & environmentally responsible business, investing and consumer resources in publications & online.
Our goal is to educate and empower individuals and businesses to make informed financial decisions through aligning their personal, corporate and financial principles.
“Responsibility from the Supermarket to the Stockmarket.”
The material presented in this news letter is for educational and informa-tional purposes only. The GreenMoney Journal does not endorse or recommend firms, products, funds or advertisers.
GreenMoney is a registered trademark.

Copyright 1995-2010 by the GreenMoneyJournal ®

Green Money is a Registrated Trademark of The GreenMoney Journal / Cliff Feigenbaum