Green Money

Green Money Journal

Subscribe to the GreenMoney Journal E-Newsletter

Community Investment Guide

Subscribe to the GreenMoney Journal

2003 Independant Press Awards
Nominee for
General Excellence
in 2001, 2002 and 2003
GreenMoney Journal to be honored by WISDOM Media

Green Money In The News

Past Issues:


Fall 2010: Socially Responsible Investing – Better Companies, Better Communities

Summer 2010: Sustainable Business – Green Building & Design

Spring 2010: Socially Responsible Investing - Where to Now? Financial Transformation

Winter 2009/10: GreenMoney's Best Articles Issue

Past Issues / Archive
1999 - 2004




Search by keyword:
Investing with your Values
The revised and updated edition of "Investing With Your Values" (New Society Publishers) can be ordered here.



The largest personal finance site devoted to Socially Responsible Investing

MicroFinance Conference

GreenMoney Journal - publishing since 1992

Fall 2010 issue

Socially Responsible Investing – Better Companies, Better Communities

 

Developments of SRI in Europe
Timo W.M. van den Brink, Director Triple P Performance Centre, The Netherlands and the annual Triple Bottom Line Conference

Interest in socially responsible investments (SRI) in Europe has grown considerably over the last five years, and its profile has recently risen even higher with the launch of a number of national initiatives. The UK, France, Germany, Belgium, and Sweden, to mention just a few, have all addressed corporate sustainability in some way, lifting the sustainable investments community to a more prominent position within financial markets. As of this writing, some 72 funds exist in Europe that use environmental and social screening.
Investments in sustainable companies are easier to find today, though more difficult to select. Regulations will help promote socially responsible investments but the real SRI challenge is to those professionals who must address its value in financial communities and corporations alike.

The first SRI-products in Europe, set up in the early 60s and 70s, were niche markets, only to emerge in a few years as more important ones. The early funds were run, for the most part, for the benefit of organizations marked through a shared ideology or religion; screening often focused on issues such as avoiding investments in armaments, child labor and racial activities. The funds were small, but with strongly committed investors. Since these origins, the SRI sector on both sides of the Atlantic has been one of the fastest growing areas of equity investment.

In Europe, the driving force behind the sector's growth has been largely from retail investment. SRI has attracted attention from institutional investors only recently. The UK legislation, which in mid-2000 intensified attention on socially screened investment products, has been followed by German, Swedish and French initiatives for more transparent investment guidelines. In contrast, institutional U.S. investors have long been more actively involved.

Today, most European financial institutions react to social investments like the fighters of ancient Athens and Sparta. Pericles declared that the pride of Athens lay in "happy versatility." "We rely," he said, "not upon management or trickery, but upon our own hearts and hands. In the matter of education, whereas they (the Spartans) are always undergoing laborious exercises to make them brave, we live at ease, and yet are equally ready to face the same perils." The financial Spartans ask "Why should one allow those 'versatile persons' without financial bones into the holy chambers of proven performances?"

I admit that the job of researching and identifying productive, "triple-bottom line" companies is not easy. The laborious exercises that have made heroes of financial analysts have not prepared them for the present perils. SRI research is far from comparably transparent, nor is it accepted like financial analyses, let alone suited to the traditional tools and paths of financial analysts. But a growing number of investors are eager to find those analysts who offer them full service in financial, environmental, social and ethical rewards.

More mutual funds tailored to sustainability are appearing. Rhineland investors are not satisfied with simple "avoidance," - the exclusions of companies in certain sectors, be it alcohol, tobacco or other issues - as the SRI accounts in Anglo-Saxon markets are based. They prefer the positive and proactive "seeking" approach. European investors emphasize their direct investments on those countries and enterprises that add a particular value to society. For example, they invest in companies that take responsibility for their operations at home and abroad.

A workable European definition of SRI is: "investing to combine financial objectives with commitment to values such as social justice, healthy environment and economic development." Within this broad European definition of SRI, two main categories can be identified: Triple bottom line screening - the selection of stocks and shares in unit trusts, investment trusts or other investment portfolios on economic, social or environmental grounds; and Shareholder influence - seeking to improve a company's ethical, social and/or environmental behavior by means of shareholder dialogue, pressure and voting at annual meetings with companies.

One issue that can easily create a crisis of confidence among SRI investors is the process of screening which companies to include in triple-bottom line investments. An investment is one of the most powerful agents available to most of us, whether individuals or members of a pension fund, for changing the corporate sector. If this view is widely recognized in the U.S., it is only now winning ground in Europe, especially for those individuals who trust their money and savings to large pension funds and privately held mutual funds. Higher investor expectations of social, ethical and environmental scrutiny in corporations have led a number of analysts to address sustainability issues. There is also a general expectation that high standards of research should avoid unfairness or unintended consequences as social, environmental and other ethical concerns become a larger part of the investment scene.

We should avoid defining exactly how investors should make use of sustainability investment products. Innovation and development require creativity rather than control. Given good information, it will be better for the development of the SRI sector to be driven by market forces and by investor perceptions than by our attempts to control the market. In fact, environmental funds might never have happened if SRI had been carved in stone 15 years ago. Public awareness of sustainability challenges financial analysts to face the perils they face.

For further information on socially responsible investment in Europe, please visit the Triple Bottom Line Conference website at-
http://www.tbli.org.
Contact Timo W.M. van den Brink by email at- timo@tbli.org Subscribe to Green Money


Home | Archives | Sponsors | Links | Calendar | Contact Us | Advertising | SRI News


Green Money Journal
Publisher & Managing Editor
Cliff Feigenbaum
Editor
Ted Ketcham  
PO Box 67
Santa Fe, NM 87504
(505) 988-7423
cliff@greenmoney.com
Subscriptions [$50]
www.greenmoney.com
(800) 849-8751

MISSION STATEMENT
The GreenMoney Journal encour-ages and promotes the awareness of socially & environmentally responsible business, investing and consumer resources in publications & online.
Our goal is to educate and empower individuals and businesses to make informed financial decisions through aligning their personal, corporate and financial principles.
“Responsibility from the Supermarket to the Stockmarket.”
The material presented in this news letter is for educational and informa-tional purposes only. The GreenMoney Journal does not endorse or recommend firms, products, funds or advertisers.
GreenMoney is a registered trademark.

Copyright 1995-2010 by the GreenMoneyJournal ®

Green Money is a Registrated Trademark of The GreenMoney Journal / Cliff Feigenbaum