Green Money

Green Money Journal

Subscribe to the GreenMoney Journal E-Newsletter

Community Investment Guide

Subscribe to the GreenMoney Journal

2003 Independant Press Awards
Nominee for
General Excellence
in 2001, 2002 and 2003
GreenMoney Journal to be honored by WISDOM Media

Green Money In The News

Past Issues:


Fall 2010: Socially Responsible Investing – Better Companies, Better Communities

Summer 2010: Sustainable Business – Green Building & Design

Spring 2010: Socially Responsible Investing - Where to Now? Financial Transformation

Winter 2009/10: GreenMoney's Best Articles Issue

Past Issues / Archive
1999 - 2004




Search by keyword:
Investing with your Values
The revised and updated edition of "Investing With Your Values" (New Society Publishers) can be ordered here.



Please support our sponsors

Please Support Our Sponsors

GreenMoney Journal - publishing since 1992

Fall 2010 issue

Socially Responsible Investing – Better Companies, Better Communities

 

SRI Funds for the Global Investor
Rona Fried

2003 was a great year for global equity markets, giving global mutual fund investors solid returns averaging in the mid-20's percentiles. Among the handful of international SRI funds, Portfolio 21, a relative newcomer (started in 1999), achieved the highest performance for 2003 - an impressive 32.2 percent. Portfolio 21 is the only SRI global fund to receive a four-star rating from Morningstar.

A brief description of the five global SRI funds:
  • Calvert World Values International Equity (CWVGX) is the oldest and largest of the SRI international funds. Started in 1992, the Fund has $235 million in assets. Like most of its peers, shareholders pay a hefty load of 4.75 percent on top of the usual mutual fund expenses. The Fund invests in mid to large cap companies worldwide, with an emphasis on the UK (25%), Japan (22%), Germany (7%) and the Netherlands (5.2%). Vodafone and France Telecom are the largest holdings. The Fund was up 29 percent for 2003 and has a three star rating from Morningstar.

  • Citizens Global Equity Fund (WAGEX) is the second largest fund in the group with $120 million in assets. Started in 1994, the Fund invests in companies of any size. Over half the investments are in US companies (51.8%), followed by the UK (13%) and Japan (8.5%). Top holdings include: Citigroup, Vodafone, UBS AG and Microsoft. The Fund was up 21.6 percent for 2003 and has a two star rating from Morningstar.

  • MMA Praxis International (MPIAX) started in 1997 and has $103 million in assets. It invests in large companies mostly in developed countries, but may invest up to 25 percent in emerging markets. Its top holdings include Eni - Ente Nazionale Idrocarburi, Siemens, Nissan Motor Co. and Vodafone. The Fund performed well in 2003, increasing by 27.1 percent, but Morningstar only gives it a one star rating.

  • Portfolio 21 (PORTX) has doubled in size over the past year and is up to $26 million in assets. The Fund is the least expensive of the group, with a moderate management fee and no load. It invests in companies of all sizes, but its largest holdings are large companies in US (27%), Sweden (10.8%), and the UK (10.2%). The largest holdings are IBM, Deutsche Bank, UBS, Nokia and Novo Nordisk. As mentioned above, Portfolio 21 is the only SRI global fund to receive a four-star rating from Morningstar, ranking them number 38 out of the 353 funds in their world stock category.

  • Enterprise Global Socially Responsive Fund (EGSAX) started in 2000 and, although it only has $7 million in assets, Morningstar gives it a 3 star rating. It invests in large companies in many countries. Among its top holdings are Pfizer, WellPoint Health Networks, Citigroup, BP Amoco, Pepsico, and Walmart. The Fund was up 26.4 percent for 2003.

    Differentiating Between the Funds
    Calvert is the oldest and largest fund of the group, and like most of its peers, focuses on investing in large companies in the developed world. Portfolio 21 and Citizens invest in companies of any size; MMA Praxis and Enterprise also invest in emerging countries. As with conventional global mutual funds, expenses tend to be on the high side. Citizens and Portfolio 21 are the only "no load" funds in the group, and Portfolio 21's management fees are the most moderate of the group.

    Of course, as SRI funds, they all seek to invest in companies that are responsible corporate citizens - that make healthy products, reduce their impact on the environment and have good labor relations.

    Where the rubber meets the road, however, is with the particular companies in which a fund invests. Here, the funds are all over the board, indicative of their differing SRI philosophies and orientations. This is where SRI investing becomes very personal; investors will want to choose funds most aligned with their values.

    Browsing through Portfolio 21's holdings, for example, is like reading a Who's Who of the world's top companies known for their excellence and commitment to sustainable business practices. Fifty-eight companies are in the portfolio because, says Carsten Henningsen, co-founder and principal, "We can't find any other companies that meet our requirements."

    Whereas the other SRI global funds screen out bad actors and look for companies that are responsible corporate citizens, Portfolio 21 goes much further in its selection process. Only the most visionary companies in the world make the grade. To Portfolio 21, that means companies that are clear leaders in moving society toward embracing environmentally sustainable practices.

    After identifying the most important ecological issues a particular industry sector faces, Portfolio 21 analysts compare each company in that sector to its peers in areas such as the company's leadership role in promoting sustainable practices, the lifecycle impacts of its products, and its investments in sustainable technologies and processes. Once a company passes this rigorous analysis, it needs to pass the usual SRI screens on the social side; a problem here would eliminate them from the portfolio. "Unlike other SRI funds, we would never have an oil company in Portfolio 21," says Carsten, "because a company in that business can't meet our definition of sustainability. The company would have to decide oil isn't a viable business and would have to be moving aggressively toward renewables to be considered."

    Portfolio 21's outstanding performance may be its reward for taking the time to identify - and having the nerve to invest in - only the world's true leaders. After all, environmental leadership is more and more correlated with excellence in management overall, one of the most important indicators for performance. We'd like to think that Portfolio 21's stellar performance is a testament that making sustainability part of a company's core business strategy positions it to be more profitable.

    Article by Rona Fried, Ph.D., president of http://www.SustainableBusiness.com
    the online community for green business with daily sustainable business news, Green Dream Jobs and Business Connections. SustainableBusiness.com also publishes Progressive Investor, a monthly newsletter that guides people toward sustainable investments. Contact Rona at- rona@sustainablebusiness.com Subscribe to Green Money


  • Home | Archives | Sponsors | Links | Calendar | Contact Us | Advertising | SRI News


    Green Money Journal
    Publisher & Managing Editor
    Cliff Feigenbaum
    Editor
    Ted Ketcham  
    PO Box 67
    Santa Fe, NM 87504
    (505) 988-7423
    cliff@greenmoney.com
    Subscriptions [$50]
    www.greenmoney.com
    (800) 849-8751

    MISSION STATEMENT
    The GreenMoney Journal encour-ages and promotes the awareness of socially & environmentally responsible business, investing and consumer resources in publications & online.
    Our goal is to educate and empower individuals and businesses to make informed financial decisions through aligning their personal, corporate and financial principles.
    “Responsibility from the Supermarket to the Stockmarket.”
    The material presented in this news letter is for educational and informa-tional purposes only. The GreenMoney Journal does not endorse or recommend firms, products, funds or advertisers.
    GreenMoney is a registered trademark.

    Copyright 1995-2010 by the GreenMoneyJournal ®

    Green Money is a Registrated Trademark of The GreenMoney Journal / Cliff Feigenbaum